Galaxy Note 5 S-Pen Sadness

A friend of mine, his name rhymes with Z Day, stuck his S-pen into his brand new Galaxy Note 5 phone backwards.  Yeah. I can’t believe it either!

His wife helped him pull it out and the s-pen was intact,  he was happy at first until he discovered the s-pen wouldn’t activate, write, or function. He’s now a sad, sad guy.



So he got desperate and looked to the interwebs.  He thought “maybe if I put it back in backwards again, and use one of the tips to remove it safely, I can make the switch flip around inside and it will work again”  He thought wrong.  Not only did his plan fail, he broke the clicky thing off inside the phone and now he can’t stow an s-pen in the phone until he gets the phone apart with the help of a neighbor with cellphone repair skills to retrieve it.

There is a lot of information out there on the web that tells you NOT to do this.  They are all correct!   There is also a lot of fear that sets in when Samsung says they won’t fix it and the warranty is void.  There are no parts to date to fix it.  Someone on eBay was selling 3d printed switch arms, but he had to recall them due to quality control issues.  My poor friend.

You’re probably not stumbling across this from a google search because you wonder what would happen if you put the pen in backwards BEFORE you do it.  Most likely you’ve already done it.

You’re probably asking google frantically, Will the S Pen work with a broken detection switch? 

Once you’ve stuck the s-pen into your phone backwards, the damage is done. The detection switch arm (about the size of an ant) is broken. Without replacing this switch arm, screen off memo and automatic activation of air-command is gone.  BUT the S-Pen will work without the detection switch.

If you’re like me, I mean that other guy I know that did this, you’ll have a moment of panic when your S-Pen doesn’t work on the screen.  Here’s how to make it work again sans automatic air-command and screen-off memo:

  1. Accept the loss.  Don’t try to fix it by putting it back in backwards (yeah, who would do that).  You’ll risk breaking off the clicky thing on the end of the s-pen inside the phone.  You’ll HAVE to take it apart to fix it then AND buy a new S-Pen.  There’s something satisfying about the clicky thing when you need to fidgit with something.
  2. Go into Settings>Device>S Pen and turn off/change the following
    1. Under Pen detachment: Change to “None”
    2. S Pen Alerts “Off”
    3. Turn off pen detection “Off”

That’s it.  As long as you don’t have to take the thing apart to get the pen out or the clicky thing out of the phone, you’ll have a 99.997% functioning Galaxy Note 5.



Cable vs Satellite – Which is the best deal?

You see the deals every day on TV and receive the post cards in the mail: “Switch to satellite and pay only $24.95/month.” But is it true?

The average Cable bill in the US is about $60/month plus tax according to FCC studies. The last cable company and current cable company I work for are about $50 plus taxes and fees for the “Expanded Basic” package.

In Cable, there are two tiers everyone gets when they sign up for cable. Basic – usually channels 2-23 on the dial (which is where your locals, educational, and shopping channels reside), and Expanded Basic. Expanded Basic is the tier where core channels as defined by the various programming providers are grouped. Contrary to popular belief, the programming providers (Discovery, Disney-ESPN, Viacom, Turner) are the ones who dictate what majority of your channels are in your lineup. The local cable provider has little choice in this. Usually Basic + Expanded is about 60 channels plus the HD Simulcasts of those channels, and about 40 digital music channels.

For most cable providers, no additional equipment is required to get this lineup, just a digital cable-ready TV Set.

Now let’s look at satellite providers. Their $24.99 deal they offer is their lowest-priced package and includes 120-190 channels. Look at their lineup, and you’ll see these channels include music channels, HD Simulcasts, West Coast duplicates of the same channels, and “filler” channels that add to the totals. Look closer, and you’ll notice core channels missing that your cable lineup does NOT include. You have to buy a pricier package to get them.

Taking about 10 minutes and going to Dish and DirecTV’s websites can tell you more. I did it, and found out DirecTV’s Entertainment package being offered at $24.95 was not $24.95. Add “Advanced Receiver fees” for 3 sets (even though they claimed the boxes were free) and the price quickly jumps to within a couple bucks of the Expanded Basic package we sell at CCC. After the first year, the bill jumps to over $70, then goes to over $90/month plus tax after the contract is up. Dish’s price jump isn’t as extreme but you’ll still pay over $75 for the “Top 120” after the contract is up. Rest assured, though, you most likely won’t get the channels you want for even that price. You’ll have to upgrade to a higher package and your savings you expected to get by switching to dish are out the window.

It pays to look at all of the details before you accept service from a satellite provider. Doing it online seems to give you a better story in writing, rather than calling. They won’t even talk to you without giving up your social security number anyway. Then they’ll skirt around the truth and not really tell you how much it is going to be. Once you take the service, you are locked into a contract for 2 years even if the “promo deals” expire during that period.

Tagged , , , , ,

Retransmission Consent Abuse

I have to warn you.  This is a political call to action.

First time I heard of Retransmission fees, was in 2006 when I was minding my own business as a network admin here at CCC.   I kept seeing crawls on the TV screen and hearing customer service reps be barraged by calls from concerned customers who wanted to keep their local stations.  Since then, I’ve watched as cable companies all over get hammered by increased fees and stringent terms as these corporations that own large cable companies force their new cash-cow down consumer’s throats.  As of 2012, retransmission fees increased over $2.6BILLION and is going higher.  TV stations are ordering cable providers all over the country to remove their signal because they refuse to sign their so-called “Deals” that increase fees by over 100%.

Yes, I’m against the Retransmission Consent laws as they are used today.  Enacted in 1992, Retransmission Consent was a rule that allowed local broadcasters to require permission for cable tv companies to carry their signal, and require a fee to do so. Prior to this, everything was “must carry” which meant if you were in coverage area of that station’s market, your cable tv operator was required to carry the station.

I’m not hostile towards free enterprise. I’m against double standards.  Broadcast TV has always been free to anyone who wanted it in the station’s coverage area.  Local stations are free if you can get their signal.  However, what if you don’t have a big antenna that can reliably pick up your local station? If you have cable for other channels, would you want to switch boxes or inputs just to see your local channels?  I used to live 30 miles from the Louisville TV station’s towers and struggled with their signal. Now I live 100 miles from Little Rock, which is also our DMA (Designated Market Area) and there’s no chance of getting local stations from there.  Since the only way I’ll get those stations are via cable or satellite, I have to pay a company to bring me the signal.  Because of Retransmission Consent fees, however, the cable tv operator or satellite operator has to pay the broadcasters a fee so they can legally provide their FREE channel to me.  Like many, I’m all for paying a cable company or satellite provider a fee to build and maintain a way to get me the signal since I’m getting other channels I’m paying to get too.  However I’m not ok paying for a broadcast station that is supposed to be free.

Here’s another way of looking at it.  Say I CAN pick up the stations from Little Rock with an antenna.  I don’t wan’t JUST the broadcast stations, though.  I want Disney, AMC, A&E, Discovery, and so on.  However, I don’t want to pay extra to get broadcast stations.  Because of Broadcast TV’s rules and contracts, my cable provider STILL has to charge me for those local stations because they are required to include them in the basic package.  If I were able to get cable without locals, I would’t even watch locals much, because of the inconvenience of changing inputs on my TV set between cable and antenna.  Then, the rating go away, as I’m sure I wouldn’t be the only one.

To me, Retransmission Consent Fees are strictly a way of making money because of a law that was written due to legislators failure to see in the future.

A Retransmission Consent fee would only be fair to the consumer if the following took place:

  • Over the air broadcast became pay tv in itself (scramble it and require decoders to force viewers to pay)
  • Cable providers were allowed to provide locals in a tier, giving consumers a choice to have these channels or not
  • Cable providers had local ad insertion rights on those channels to help recuperate from the fees (much like is done with the cable channels broadcast channels feel they are equal to).
  • Broadcast stations were priced based on a local rating system, rather than a network rating system. Not all locals are equal with their news and weather.
  • Broadcast stations were required to break into programming for severe weather in their ENTIRE coverage area – not just their home city and surrounding counties.  Also they would be required to cover news relevant to the entire coverage area.  If this requirement wasn’t kept, there would be a discount on the amount of time the local content was played to level the playing field.
  • Fair negotiations were genuinely fair.  A small cable provider would get rates within 10% of what the other providers in their area pay.
  • Copyright Licensing fees were paid by the station, not the cable/satellite provider.  (Yes, another fee Cable has to pay to provide your “free” over the air channels.)

If Broadcast wants what I’ve heard them call “Their fair share,” they need to play by the rules other pay channels play by in the free market system.  Retransmission consent fees are programming fees, plain and simple.  Either it’s free or it’s not.  It can’t be both ways.

Here’s your call to action.  There is an Act that has been presented by Rep Anna Eshoo on in Capitol Hill. It’s called the Video Choice act. You can find a PDF of it here:  In general, it’s a good start, and if the above changes could be worked in, it would be much better.  Please, write or call your US Senator or Representative in favor of the Video Choice Act.  If you live in Arkansas, Senator Pryor is key in pushing this through. I know this isn’t as important as the healthcare mess, or the national debt being messed up, but I believe this is something Congress can do that they can actually work together on to fix.

Tagged , , , , , , ,
The Pastor's Desk

A Pastor's thoughts on life, church, God, & other stuff

social networking ate my blog

or probably I'm just making excuses

Discipleship Avenue

Discipleship Avenue exists to Educate, Equip, and Empower our communities by providing strategic services and resources that meet their needs.

A journal of my faith, family and life

A journal of my faith, family and life

Notes from the Trail

Life, adventure and faith from southwest Virginia

Soul Health Care

Proclaiming Christ as the Great Physician of the Soul

%d bloggers like this: